Skip to main content

Full text of "Birds of a Great Basin sagebrush habitat in east-central Nevada"

See other formats


i 


i 


Historic,  archived  document 


Do  not  assume  content  reflects  current 
scientific  knowledge,  policies,  or  practices. 


I 


1 


'         United  States 
i2  Department 
^       cjf  Agriculture 

Forest  Service 


Intermountain 
Research  Station 

Research  Paper 
INT-452 

April  1992 


Birds  of  a  Great  Basin 
Sagebrush  Habitat  in 
East-Central  Nevada 


Dean  E.  Medin 


THE  AUTHOR 


RESEARCH  SUMMARY 


DEAN  E.  MEDIN  recently  retired  as  a  research  wildlife 
biologist  with  the  Intermountain  Research  Station  at 
the  Forestry  Sciences  Laboratory  in  Boise,  ID.  He 
earned  a  B.S.  degree  in  forest  nnanagement  from  Iowa 
State  University  in  1957,  and  from  Colorado  State 
University  he  earned  an  M.S.  degree  in  wildlife  man- 
agement in  1959  and  a  Ph.D.  degree  in  range  ecosys- 
tems in  1976.  His  research  has  included  studies  in 
mule  deer  ecology,  big-game  range  improvement, 
mule  deer  population  modeling,  and  nongame  bird  and 
small  mammal  ecology  and  habitat  management. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  gratefully  acknowledge  the  valuable  field  assis- 
tance of  J.  Russell  Groves  and  Michael  D.  Carter. 
Jean  Martin,  illustrator,  drew  the  cover  art. 


Breeding  bird  densities  and  bird  community  organi- 
zation of  a  Great  Basin  sagebrush  ecosystem  in  the 
Snake  Valley  of  east-central  Nevada  were  determined 
by  spot-mapping  on  a  20-ha  plot  during  April,  May, 
and  June,  1981  to  1983.  Total  density  of  the  breeding 
bird  community  ranged  from  3.35  to  3.48  individuals/ha 
over  the  3-year  study.  Bird  standing  crop  biomass 
ranged  from  53  to  61  g/ha.  From  five  to  six  species 
bred  on  the  study  plot  each  year.  The  most  abundant 
birds  were  Brewer's  sparrows  and  sage  sparrows. 
Those  two  species,  plus  the  sage  thrasher  and  black- 
throated  sparrow,  characterized  the  breeding  bird 
community  and  accounted  for  over  95  percent  of  the 
total  population.  Horned  larks  and  western  meadow- 
larks  were  less  common.  Results  are  compared  with 
breeding  bird  populations  in  Great  Basin  sagebrush 
habitats  elsewhere  in  the  United  States. 


Intermountain  Research  Station 
324  25th  Street 
Ogden,  UT  84404 


Birds  of  a  Great  Basin  Sagebrusli 
Habitat  in  East-Central  Nevada 

Dean  E.  Medin 


INTRODUCTION 

Kiichler  (1970)  mapped  the  Great  Basin  sage- 
brush (Artemisia)  ecosystem  type  in  North  America. 
The  type  covers  nearly  18  milHon  ha  and  extends 
over  parts  of  Nevada,  Utah,  Arizona,  Colorado, 
California,  and  New  Mexico.  West  (1983)  defined 
the  ecosystem  type  and  described  its  features.  The 
ecosystem  type  is  located  south  of  the  sagebrush 
steppes  and  generally  north  of  the  creosotebush 
(Larrea)  and  blackbrush  (Coleogyne)  types.  It  is 
elevationally  positioned  between  the  salt-desert 
shrublands  at  the  lowest  elevations  and  the  conifer 
woodlands  on  the  lower  flanks  of  the  mountains 
(West4983). 

There  are  few  quantitative  assessments  of  breed- 
ing bird  populations  in  these  vast  areas  used 
primarily  for  domestic  livestock  production.  This 
information  is  basic  to  understanding  the  ecology 
of  semidesert  birds  and  the  stewardship  of  their 
habitats.  In  this  paper  I  describe  breeding  bird 
densities  of  a  sagebrush  ecosystem  in  the  Snake 
Valley  of  east-central  Nevada  and  compare  them 
with  other  quantitative  studies  of  birds  in  similar 
Great  Basin  sagebrush  habitats.  The  study,  con- 
ducted from  1981  to  1983,  was  restricted  to  pas- 
serine species. 

STUDY  AREA 

The  study  area,  located  68  km  southeast  of  Ely  in 
southeastern  White  Pine  County,  NV,  has  a  median 
elevation  of  approximately  1,710  m.  The  study  site 
is  generally  flat  and  positioned  on  a  broad,  gently 
sloping  pediment  facing  northeast.  The  area  is 
bounded  on  the  west  by  foothills  and  mountains 
and  on  the  east  by  a  flat  valley  bottom.  There  are 
no  seeps,  springs,  or  live  streams  on  the  site.  Dry 
washes  are  a  prominent  feature  of  the  local  land- 
scape. The  area  is  semiarid  with  cold  winters  and 
hot,  dry  summers.  Maximum  temperatures  in 
summer  may  exceed  35  °C,  and  minimum  tempera- 
tures in  winter  often  drop  to  -29  °C  (Houghton  and 
others  1975).  Average  annual  precipitation  at  Ely 
(elevation  1,905  m)  is  221  mm,  with  peaks  in  April 
and  May  (U.S.  Department  of  Commerce  1970). 

During  the  study  period,  Wyoming  big  sagebrush 
(Artemisia  tridentata  var.  wyomingensis)  dominated 


the  vegetation.  Other  important  shrubs  included 
black  sagebrush  (A.  arbuscula  var.  nova),  rabbit- 
brush  (Chrysothamnus  uiscidiflorus),  and  spiny  hop- 
sage  (Grayia  spinosa).  The  principal  herbaceous 
species  were  grasses,  especially  cheatgrass  (Bromus 
tectorum),  and  Sandberg  bluegrass  (Poa  sandbergii). 
Forbs  were  less  abundant,  but  species  of  milkvetch 
(Astragalus),  fleabane  (Erigeron),  and  pepperweed 
(Lepidium)  were  widespread. 

The  study  area  was  grazed  lightly  by  domestic 
sheep  trailing  to  and  from  seasonal  ranges.  The 
study  site  is  on  public  lands  and  administered  by 
the  Bureau  of  Land  Management,  U.S.  Department 
of  the  Interior. 

METHODS 

A  20-ha  plot  was  censused  for  breeding  birds 
using  the  Williams  spot-map  method  (International 
Bird  Census  Committee  1970).  The  census  plot  was 
chosen  to  best  represent  the  Great  Basin  sagebrush 
ecosystem  type  in  the  Snake  Valley.  The  square 
plot  was  surveyed  and  gridded  with  points  num- 
bered and  marked  with  stakes  at  75-m  intervals. 
Ten  census  visits  to  the  plot  were  made  annually 
between  April  1  and  June  12,  from  1981  to  1983. 
Most  of  the  spot-mapping  was  done  between  sunrise 
and  early  afternoon  when  birds  were  most  active. 
To  ensure  complete  coverage,  the  plot  was  censused 
by  walking  within  50  m  of  all  points  on  the  grid. 
Census  routes  were  varied.  Recorded  bird  observa- 
tions extended  a  minimum  of  50  m  beyond  plot 
boundaries. 

At  the  end  of  the  sampling  period  each  year, 
clusters  of  observations  and  coded  activity  patterns 
on  species  maps  were  circled  to  define  breeding  bird 
territories.  Fractional  parts  of  boundary  territories 
were  included  in  the  results.  The  reciprocal  of 
Simpson's  index  (Z)  =  1/  Z p.^,  where  p. is  the  propor- 
tion of  the  sample  belonging  to  the  ith  species)  was 
used  to  calculate  species  diversity  (Hill  1973).  Bird 
standing  crop  biomass  was  calculated  as  B  =  L 
(N.W.),  where  N.  is  the  density  of  the  ith  species, 
and  W.  is  the  mean  body  weight  (g)  per  individual 
of  the  ith  species.  Species  weights  were  from 
Dunning  (1984). 


1 


Plant  taxonomy  follows  Holmgren  and  Reveal 
(1966).  Bird  nomenclature  is  from  the  American 
Ornithologists'  Union  (1983)  checklist. 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

Six  passerine  bird  species  bred  on  the  study  plot 
(table  1).  Total  breeding  bird  density  ranged  from 
3.35  to  3.48  individuals/ha  over  the  3-year  study. 
Total  bird  standing  crop  biomass  ranged  from  53 
to  61  g/ha.  Five  to  six  species  were  territorial  on  the 
plot  in  any  given  year.  The  most  common  breeders 
were  Brewer's  sparrows  (Spizella  breweri)  and  sage 
sparrows  {Amphispiza  belli).  Those  two  species, 
plus  the  black-throated  sparrow  {Amphispiza 
bilineata)  and  sage  thrasher  {Oreoscoptes  mon- 
tanus),  accounted  for  over  95  percent  of  the  total 
passerine  population.  Horned  larks  (Eremophila 
alpestris)  and  western  meadowlarks  {Sturnella 
neglecta)  were  less  common. 

Other  species,  observed  as  occasional  visitors  on 
or  over  the  study  plot  during  the  breeding  season, 
included  northern  harrier  {Circus  cyaneus),  red- 
tailed  hawk  {Buteo  Jamaicensis),  golden  eagle  {Aquila 
chrysaetos),  American  kestrel  {Falco  sparverius), 
sage  grouse  {Centrocercus  urophasianus),  mourning 
dove  {Zenaida  macroura),  broad-tailed  humming- 
bird {Selasphorus  platycercus),  violet-green  swallow 


{Tachycineta  thalassina),  American  crow  {Corvus 
brachyrhynchos),  common  raven  {Corvus  corax),  and 
loggerhead  shrike  {Lanius  ludovicianus). 

Less  frequently  observed  birds  were  ferruginous 
hawk  {Buteo  regalis),  prairie  falcon  {Falco  mexi- 
canus),  common  nighthawk  {Chordeiles  minor),  cliff 
swallow  {Hirundo  pyrrhonota),  barn  swallow  {Hirundo 
rustica),  black-billed  magpie  {Pica  pica),  mountain 
bluebird  {Sialia  currucoides),  green-tailed  towhee 
{Pipilo  chlorurus),  and  vesper  sparrow  {Pooecetes 
gramineus). 

Brewer's  sparrows,  sage  sparrows,  and  sage 
thrashers — widespread  species  in  Great  Basin  sage- 
brush ecosystems — occurred  throughout  the  study 
plot.  Braun  and  others  (1976)  referred  to  those 
species  as  sagebrush  obligates  because  of  their  close 
association  with  sagebrush  habitats.  In  my  study, 
those  species  were  observed  most  often  where  sage- 
brush shrubs  were  taller  and  more  dense.  Sage 
sparrows  and  sage  thrashers  have  been  found  to  be 
more  abundant  in  areas  of  high  sagebrush  densities 
(Wiens  and  Rotenberry  1981).  Horned  larks  and 
western  meadowlarks  were  found  in  more  restricted 
locations  on  the  study  plot  where  shrub  vegetation 
was  lower  and  more  open.  Although  black-throated 
sparrows  were  distributed  throughout  the  plot,  I 
was  unable  to  discern  any  association  with  the 
structure  or  composition  of  the  vegetation  except 


Table  1 — Passerine  breeding  bird  densities  (individuals/ha)  in  Great  Basin  sagebrush  vegetation,  east-central 
Nevada,  1981-1983 


Foraging 

Nesting 

Density 

Species 

category' 

substrate^ 

1981 

1982 

1983 

Horned  lark 

GGO 

G 

0.15 

0.15 

0.12 

{Eremophila  aipestris) 

Sage  thrasher 

GGI 

B 

.40 

.12 

.28 

{Oreoscoptes  montanus) 

Brewer's  sparrow 

GGI 

B 

1.68 

1.52 

1.50 

{Spizella  brewer!) 

Black-throated  sparrow 

CGI 

B 

.35 

.80 

.48 

{Amphispiza  bilineata) 

Sage  sparrow 

GFO 

B 

.90 

.85 

.95 

{Amphispiza  belli) 

Western  meadowlark 

GGI 

G 

+ 

.02 

{Sturnella  neglecta) 

Total  individuals/ha 

3.48 

3.44 

3.35 

Standing  crop  biomass  (g/ha] 

61 

53 

58 

Species  richness  (S) 

5 

5 

6 

Species  diversity  (D)^ 

3.08 

3.19 

3.23 

Species  evenness  (E)^ 

.82 

.87 

.83 

'After  DeGraff  and  others  (1985).  GGO  =  ground  gleaning  omnivore;  GGI 

=  ground  gleaning  insectlvore;  CGI 

=  canopy 

gleaning  insectivore;  GFO  =  ground  foraging  omnivore. 
^G  =  ground  nester:  B  =  bush  nester. 

2+  indicates  bird  observed  infrequently  (less  than  three  registrations). 
■•Species  weights  from  Dunning  (1984). 
^After  Hill  (1973). 


2 


that  the  tallest  shrubs  were  used  as  singing 
perches. 

Brewer's  sparrow,  the  most  abundant  breeder  in 
my  study,  is  probably  the  most  characteristic  bird 
of  sagebrush-dominated  ecosystems  throughout 
western  North  America  (Ryser  1985;  Wiens  and 
Rotenberry  1981).  They  are  dependent  on  shrubby 
habitats  that  provide  protective  cover,  song  perches, 
and  nest  sites  (Johnsgard  and  Rickard  1957).  This 
sparrow  normally  breeds  in  sagebrush  habitats  but 
will  also  nest  in  a  variety  of  other  suitable  shrubs 
(Short  1984).  Effective  sagebrush  control  reduces 
habitat  use  by  the  Brewer's  sparrow  (Best  1972). 
The  abundance  of  this  sparrow  in  its  breeding  range 
has  been  shown  to  be  positively  correlated  with 
percentage  cover  of  shrubs  and  cacti,  forbs,  and  bare 
ground,  and  negatively  correlated  with  percentage 
cover  of  grasses  and  litter  (Rotenberry  and  Wiens 
1980a). 

Sage  sparrows  and  sage  thrashers  are  frequently 
cohabitants  in  sagebrush  ecosystems  over  much  of 
their  breeding  range  (Wiens  and  Rotenberry  1981). 
Sage  sparrows  were  singing  sporadically  when  I 
began  census  work  on  April  1;  sage  thrashers  were 
first  recorded  singing  about  1  to  2  weeks  later. 
Their  breeding  territories  were  distributed  through- 
out the  study  plot,  and  they  frequently  overlapped. 
I  found  both  species  most  abundant  in  areas  with 
high  sagebrush  densities.  They  apparently  prefer 
larger  shrubs  for  nesting  (Peterson  and  Best  1985; 
Reynolds  1981).  McAdoo  and  others  (1989)  found 
sage  thrasher  abundance  uncorrelated  with  shrub 
height. 

Black-throated  sparrows  are  locally  common 
breeders  in  Great  Basin  sagebrush  ecosystems 
(Ryser  1985).  They  also  occur  in  a  variety  of  other 
shrubby  habitats,  particularly  those  of  drier,  hotter. 


desert  valleys  (DeGraaf  and  others  1991).  Their 
breeding  range  extends  farther  south  than  that  of 
Brewer's  sparrows,  sage  sparrows,  and  sage  thrash- 
ers (American  Ornithologists'  Union  1983).  I  found 
their  breeding  territories  widespread  on  the  study 
plot  and  generally  noncontiguous.  Singing  males 
were  first  noted  in  mid-April,  and  pairing  was 
evident  by  early  May.  Breeding  density  in  1982 
was  about  twice  that  in  1981  and  1983  (table  1). 

Horned  larks  and  western  meadowlarks  are 
widely  distributed  species  and  among  the  most 
adaptable  birds  of  Western  rangelands  (DeGraaf 
and  others  1991).  They  are  common  permanent 
residents  in  the  Great  Basin  (Ryser  1985),  and 
generally  categorized  as  grass-inhabiting  species 
(Rotenberry  and  Wiens  1980b).  I  found  them 
localized  on  the  study  plot  and  in  consistently  low 
densities  (table  1).  Among  the  breeding  bird  species 
recorded  during  the  study,  only  the  horned  lark  and 
western  meadowlark  were  ground  nesters. 

Few  other  assessments  of  breeding  bird  densities 
in  the  Great  Basin  sagebrush  ecosystem  type  are 
available  (table  2).  McKernan  (1978a,  b)  and  Stewart 
(1979a,  b)  reported  total  breeding  bird  densities  of 
0.38  to  2.30  individuals/ha  on  two  sagebrush  study 
plots  in  east-central  California.  One  plot  was  heavi- 
ly grazed  by  feral  burros  and  the  other  was  an  un- 
grazed  control.  Increased  density  on  the  heavily 
grazed  plot  in  1979  may  have  been  related  to  a  tem- 
porary reduction  of  grazing  in  that  year.  Castrale 
(1982)  found  total  densities  on  variously  treated 
sagebrush  plots  in  north-central  Utah  ranging  from 
1.62  to  2.18  individuals/ha.  Breeding  birds  included 
Brewer's  sparrow,  sage  thrasher,  vesper  sparrow, 
horned  lark,  and  western  meadowlark. 

Although  not  included  in  the  Great  Basin  sage- 
brush ecosystem  type,  breeding  bird  densities 


Table  2 — Breeding  bird  densities  (individuals/ha)  in  the  Great  Basin  sagebrush  ecosystem  type'' 

Total        Number  of 


Location 

Year 

density 

species 

Treatment 

Reference 

East-central  California 

1978 

0.38 

3 

Heavily  grazed 

McKernan  1978a 

1978 

.76 

5 

Ungrazed 

McKernan  1978b 

East-central  California 

1979 

2.30 

6 

Heavily  grazed 

Stewart  1979a 

1979 

.86 

6 

Ungrazed 

Stewart  1979b 

North-central  Utah 

1979 

2.00 

5 

1 7-year-old  plowed 

Castrale  1982 

1980 

2.18 

5 

1 7-year-old  plowed 

Castrale  1982 

North-central  Utah 

1979 

1.62 

4 

4-year-old  chained 

Castrale  1982 

1980 

1.82 

5 

4-year-old  chained 

Castrale  1982 

North-central  Utah 

1979 

2.12 

5 

4-year-old  burned 

Castrale  1982 

1980 

1.82 

6 

4-year-old  burned 

Castrale  1982 

East-central  Nevada 

1981 

3.48 

5 

Lightly  grazed 

This  study 

1982 

3.44 

5 

Lightly  grazed 

This  study 

1983 

3.35 

6 

Lightly  grazed 

This  study 

'Great  Basin  sagebrush  ecosystem  type  as  mapped  by  Kuchler  (1970)  and  defined  by  West  (1983). 


reported  by  Rotenberry  and  Wiens  (1980b)  in  more 
northerly  shrubsteppe  habitats  compared  favorably 
to  those  I  found  in  east-central  Nevada.  Average 
total  densities  reported  by  those  authors  from  14 
Northwestern  shrubsteppe  locations  ranged  from 
3.48  to  3.68  individuals/ha  from  1977  to  1979.  The 
most  abundant  species  in  their  surveys  included 
Brewer's  sparrows,  sage  sparrows,  sage  thrashers, 
horned  larks,  and  western  meadowlarks. 

REFERENCES 

American  Ornithologists'  Union.  1983.  Checklist  of 
North  American  birds.  6th  ed.  Washington,  DC: 
American  Ornithologists'  Union.  877  p. 

Best,  Louis  B.  1972.  First-year  eflFects  of  sagebrush 
control  on  two  sparrows.  Journal  of  Wildlife 
Management.  36(2):  534-544. 

Braun,  Clait  E.;  Baker,  Maurice  F.;  Eng,  Robert  L.; 
Gashwiler,  Jay  S.;  Schroeder,  Max  H.  1976. 
Conservation  committee  report  on  effects  of  alter- 
ation of  sagebrush  communities  on  the  associated 
avifauna.  Wilson  Bulletin.  88(1):  165-171. 

Castrale,  John  S.  1982.  Effects  of  two  sagebrush 
control  methods  on  nongame  birds.  Journal  of 
Wildlife  Management.  46(4):  945-952. 

DeGraaf,  Richard  M.;  Tilghman,  Nancy  G.;  Anderson, 
Stanley  H.  1985.  Foraging  guilds  of  North  American 
birds.  Environmental  Management.  9(6):  493-536. 

DeGraaf,  Richard  M.;  Scott,  Virgil  E.;  Hamre,  R.  H.; 
Ernst,  Liz;  Anderson,  Stanley  H.  1991.  Forest  and 
rangeland  birds  of  the  United  States.  Agric.  Handb. 
688.  Washington,  DC:  U.S.  Department  of 
Agriculture.  625  p. 

Dunning,  John  B.,  Jr.  1984.  Body  weights  of  686 
species  of  North  American  birds.  Monogr.  1.  Tucson, 
AZ:  Western  Bird  Banding  Association.  38  p. 

Hill,  M.  0.  1973.  Diversity  and  evenness:  a  unifying 
notation  and  its  consequences.  Ecology.  54(2): 
427-432. 

Holmgren,  Arthur  H.;  Reveal,  James  L.  1966.  Check- 
list of  the  vascular  plants  of  the  Intermountain 
Region.  Res.  Pap.  INT-32.  Ogden,  UT:  U.S.  Depart- 
ment of  Agriculture,  Forest  Service,  Intermountain 
Forest  and  Range  Experiment  Station.  160  p. 

Houghton,  John  G.;  Sakamoto,  Clarence  M.;  Gifford, 
Richard  0.  1975.  Nevada's  weather  and  climate. 
Spec.  Publ.  2.  Reno,  NV:  University  of  Nevada, 
Nevada  Bureau  of  Mines  and  Geology.  78  p. 

International  Bird  Census  Committee.  1970.  An 
international  standard  for  a  mapping  method  in 
bird  census  work.  Audubon  Field  Notes.  24(6): 
722-726. 


Johnsgard,  P.  A.;  Rickard,  W.  H.  1957.  The  relation 
of  spring  bird  distribution  to  a  vegetation  mosaic  in 
southeastern  Washington.  Ecology.  38(1):  171-174. 
,  Kiichler,  A.  W.  1970.  Potential  natural  vegetation 
(map  at  scale  of  1:7,500,000).  In:  The  National  Atlas 
of  the  U.S.A.  Washington,  DC:  U.S.  Geological 
Survey:  90-91. 

McAdoo,  J.  Kent;  Longland,  William  S.;  Evans, 
Raymond  A.  1989.  Nongame  bird  community 
responses  to  sagebrush  invasion  of  crested  wheat- 
grass  seedings.  Journal  of  Wildlife  Management. 
53(2):  494-502. 

McKernan,  Robert  L.  1978a.  Sagebrush  scrub  I. 
American  Birds.  32(1):  104. 

McKernan,  Robert  L.  1978b.  Sagebrush  scrub  II. 
American  Birds.  32(1):  104. 

Peterson,  Kenneth  L.;  Best,  Louis  B.  1985.  Nest-site 
selection  by  sage  sparrows.  Condor.  87(2):  217-221. 

Reynolds,  Timothy  D.  1981.  Nesting  of  the  sage 
thrasher,  sage  sparrow,  and  Brewer's  sparrow  in 
southeastern  Idaho.  Condor.  83(1):  61-64. 

Rotenberry,  John  T.;  Wiens,  John  A.  1980a.  Habitat 
structure,  patchiness,  and  avian  communities  in 
North  American  steppe  vegetation:  a  multivariate 
analysis.  Ecology.  61(5):  1228-1250. 

Rotenberry,  John  T.;  Wiens,  John  A.  1980b.  Temporal 
variation  in  habitat  structure  and  shrubsteppe  bird 
dynamics.  Oecologia.  47:  1-9. 

Ryser,  Fred  A.,  Jr.  1985.  Birds  of  the  Great  Basin. 
Reno,  NV:  University  of  Nevada  Press.  605  p. 

Short,  Henry  L.  1984.  Habitat  suitability  index 
models:  Brewer's  sparrow.  FWS/OBS-82/10.83. 
Washington,  DC:  U.S.  Department  of  the  Interior, 
Fish  and  Wildlife  Service,  Division  of  Biological 
Services.  16  p. 

Stewart,  Robert  M.  1979a.  Sagebrush  scrub  I. 
American  Birds.  33(1):  94-95. 

Stewart,  Robert  M.  1979b.  Sagebrush  scrub  II. 
American  Birds.  33(1):  95. 

U.S.  Department  of  Commerce.  1970.  Climatological 
summary:  Ely,  Nevada.  In:  Climatography  of  the 
United  States  No.  20-26.  Reno,  NV:  Environ- 
mental Science  Services  Administration  in 
cooperation  with  University  of  Nevada,  College 
of  Agriculture.  2  p. 

West,  N.  E.  1983.  Great  Basin-Colorado  Plateau 
sagebrush  semi-desert.  In:  West,  N.  E.,  ed.  Eco- 
systems of  the  world.  Vol.  5.  Temperate  deserts 
and  semideserts.  New  York:  Elsevier  Publishing 
Company:  331-349. 

Wiens,  John  A.;  Rotenberry,  John  T.  1981.  Habitat 
associations  and  community  structure  of  birds  in 
shrubsteppe  environments.  Ecological  Monographs. 
51(1):  21-41. 


4 


Medin,  Dean  E.  1992.  Birds  of  a  Great  Basin  sagebrush  habitat  in  east-central  Nevada. 
Res.  Pap.  INT-452.  Ogden,  UT:  U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  Forest  Service,  Inter- 
mountain  Research  Station.  4  p. 

Breeding  bird  populations  ranged  from  3.35  to  3.48  individuals/ha  over  a  3-ye'ar  study 
conducted  from  1981  to  1983.  Brewer's  sparrows,  sage  sparrows,  sage  thrashers,  and 
black-throated  sparrows  were  numerically  dominant.  Horned  larks  and  western  meadow- 
larks  were  less  common.  Results  are  compared  with  bird  populations  in  Great  Basin 
sagebrush  habitats  elsewhere  in  the  United  States. 


KEYWORDS:  breeding  birds,  density,  diversity,  biomass,  sagebrush  ecosystem  type, 
Artemisia  tridentata,  semi-desert 


Printed  on  recycled  paper 


The  Intermountain  Research  Station  provides  scientific  knowledge  and  technology  to  im- 
prove management,  protection,  and  use  of  the  forests  and  rangelands  of  the  Intermountain 
West.  Research  is  designed  to  meet  the  needs  of  National  Forest  managers,  Federal  and 
State  agencies,  industry,  academic  institutions,  public  and  private  organizations,  and  individu- 
als. Results  of  research  are  made  available  through  publications,  symposia,  workshops, 
training  sessions,  and  personal  contacts. 

The  Intermountain  Research  Station  territory  includes  Montana,  Idaho,  Utah,  Nevada,  and 
western  Wyoming.  Eighty-five  percent  of  the  lands  in  the  Station  area,  about  231  million 
acres,  are  classified  as  forest  or  rangeland.  They  include  grasslands,  deserts,  shmblands, 
alpine  areas,  and  forests.  They  provide  fiber  for  forest  industries,  minerals  and  fossil  fuels  for 
energy  and  industrial  development,  water  for  domestic  and  industrial  consumption,  forage  for 
livestock  and  wildlife,  and  recreation  opportunities  for  millions  of  visitors. 

Several  Station  units  conduct  research  in  additional  western  States,  or  have  missions  that 
are  national  or  international  in  scope. 

Station  laboratories  are  located  in: 

Boise,  Idaho 

Bozeman,  Montana  (in  cooperation  with  Montana  State  University) 
Logan,  Utah  (in  cooperation  with  Utah  State  University) 
Missoula,  Montana  (in  cooperation  with  the  University  of  Montana) 
Moscow,  Idaho  (in  cooperation  with  the  University  of  Idaho) 
Ogden,  Utah 

Provo,  Utah  (in  cooperation  with  Brigham  Young  University) 
Reno,  Nevada  (in  cooperation  with  the  University  of  Nevada) 

USDA  policy  prohibits  discrimination  because  of  race,  color,  national  origin,  sex,  age,  reli- 
gion, or  handicapping  condition.  Any  person  who  believes  he  or  she  has  been  discriminated 
against  in  any  USDA-related  activity  should  immediately  contact  the  Secretary  of  Agriculture, 
Washington,  DC  20250. 


♦  U.S.  GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE:  J  9  92  .  6  7  3-  Oky^ioii